Phone Companies That Allowed Wiretaps Shouldn't Get Immunity

Go down

Phone Companies That Allowed Wiretaps Shouldn't Get Immunity

Post by scarface on May 24th 2008, 4:14 am

They should have to prove they acted legally and in good faith, or face the consequences.
Erik Larkin, PC World
Friday, May 23, 2008 10:00 PM PDT

AT&T and other telecommunications companies are being sued for allegedly allowing federal au­thorities to tap phone lines for years without a warrant. President George W. Bush wants Congress to grant the companies retroactive immunity, and the Senate has agreed. But I think such a grant of blanket immunity would be a big mistake.

To be sure, this is a thorny issue that pits concerns over civil liberties and privacy against national security and government secrecy. Available information says the government wanted the wiretaps to catch communications with overseas terrorists shortly after 9/11. And certainly it was a frantic, desperate time. But the whole point of laws is to ensure that we--and more important, our government--act with regard for both safety and essential freedoms at just such periods. So you should care about how these cases are settled.

Here's the main issue: Class-action lawsuits claim the companies broke the law by allowing the government to implement wiretaps without a warrant or special certification. The companies say they acted in "good faith"--and there's no denying that they acted in response to requests from the highest levels of government.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,146116-c,privacylegislation/article.html
avatar
scarface
Global Mod
Global Mod

Number of posts : 54
Registration date : 2008-04-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum